The EB-5 visa program requires an investment of capital of at least one million U.S. dollars (except for certain target investment areas). Cash investment is perhaps the most direct way to meet the capital requirement. However, the regulations also allow other forms of capital investment including equipment, inventory, other tangible property and cash equivalents. Further, debts secured by assets owned by the investor entrepreneur also qualifies as capital as long as the investor is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise are not used to secure any of the debts. Such a broad definition of capital makes it easier for investors to inject capital into their businesses. For instance, a restaurant owner may have a portion of the capital invested in equipment and cooking appliances; a pharmaceutical company may partially satisfy the capital requirement by investing in laboratory equipments and facilities; and a manufacturer or distributor of goods could meet the capital equipment through the purchase of inventory and other assets. All assets are valued at fair market value in United States dollars.

Another important requirement of capital is that it must come from lawful sources. Assets obtained through unlawful or criminal means cannot be used to meet the capital investment requirement. To prove the lawfulness of sources of capital, an investor must provide documentary evidence including: (1) Foreign business registration records, (2) Corporate, partnership (or any other business entity), and personal tax returns including income, franchise, property (whether real, personal, or intangible) filed within five years in or outside the United States by or on behalf of the immigrant investor; (3) Evidence identifying any other sources of capital; or, (4) Certified copies of any judgments or evidence of all pending governmental civil or criminal actions, and any private civil actions involving monetary judgments against the immigrant investor from any court in or outside the United States within the past fifteen years. Unfortunately, many investors are able to come up with the capital for investment but are not able to provide evidence to prove that the capital comes from lawful sources.

Finally, it is important to note that although an investor must commit to invest one million U.S. dollars in the enterprise, there is no requirement that the full amount must be invested when an EB-5 visa application is filed. An investor can use documents to show that she is in the process of investing the capital, perhaps in different stages depending on the needs of the business enterprise.

The 3/10 Year Bar
Section 212(a)(9) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that any noncitizen who after having been unlawfully present in the United States for 180-364 days and then voluntarily departs the country before they are placed in removal proceedings is not allowed to return to the United States for three (3) years. Similarly, a noncitizen who has been unlawfully present in the United States for one year or longer and then departs or is deported is not allowed to return to the United States for ten (10) years. These are known as the 3-year-bar and the 10-year-bar. There are some exceptions for asylum applicants, battered spouses, certain family unity beneficiaries and minor children. Furthermore, the unlawful period can be tolled for good cause and non-frivolous requests for extensions. Otherwise, if these noncitizens wish to return to the United States, they must first obtain a waiver from the U.S. government. The Department of Homeland Security has discretion to waive the 3/10-year-bars if the noncitizen can show that his U.S. citizen or legal resident spouse or parent will suffer extreme hardship if he is not allowed to return to the U.S.

Catch 22
For many foreigners who have accrued unlawful presence in the United States but are otherwise eligible for an immigrant visa, they are caught in a “Catch 22” situation. On the one hand, they are not allowed to apply for a green card within the United States because of their unlawful status. On the other, they do not want to leave the country for fear that they would not be able to return to the U.S. because of the 3/10-year-bars. Even if they are eligible to apply for a waiver based on hardship of their spouses and/or parents, they are afraid that the waiver might not be approved. The current policy is that the wavier must be filed with an overseas DHS office. In short, they are stuck between two equally undesirable options.

The New Proposal
The DHS recently announced that it intends to publish in the Federal Register a proposal to revise the procedures for determining the unlawful presence (family unity) waivers for spouses and children of U.S. citizens. The new proposal creates an “in-country processing” mechanism for noncitizens who are spouses and children of U.S. citizens to file the unlawful presence waiver. A noncitizen who has accrued unlawful presence would be able to apply for the waiver from within the United States. This “in-country processing” proposal would permit USCIS to grant a provisional waiver. Applicants would still be required to depart from the U.S. before receiving a final approval on their application. By pre-processing the family unity waiver, the applicant’s waiting time will be shortened. Currently applicants face a long wait when seeking a waiver outside the U.S. The goal of this new proposal is to encourage more noncitizens to come forward to file their immigrant and waiver petitions in the United States.

This process, however, does not change the legal requirements for immigrant visa petition or the family unity waiver application. The “law” regarding immigrant visas and waiver adjudication has not been changed. The change is only procedural in nature. Further, it is important to note that the proposal will not cover spouses and children of legal permanent residents. They must still follow the existing procedure and apply for a waiver at an overseas U.S. consulate office. Finally, applicants must not rely on this proposal yet until it is finalized. Thus far, the DHS has only published a statement of intent to propose the change. It is expected that the change will not be finalized until the end of 2012. Interested foreigners may start gathering documentary evidence to establish their eligibility for a waiver but should not act hastily before they have discussed their case with a qualified immigration attorney.

Congress created the U visa in The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (VTVPA) of 2000 to encourage victims to report crimes and help law enforcement officials to investigate and prosecute criminal activities regardless of the victims’ immigration status. Women and children are especially vulnerable to certain crimes such as human trafficking, sexual assault and domestic violence. If a U visa petition is approved, the petitioner receives nonimmigrant status to live and work in the United States for up to four years. Subsequently, qualified recipients may apply to adjust status to become a lawful permanent resident (green card) after three years of continuous presence in the U.S. as a U visa holder. There are other eligibility requirements for a green card as well, including the ongoing duty to cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation or prosecution of the qualifying crime. Additionally, other immediate family members of U visa recipients may also be eligible to live and work in the United States as derivative U visa recipients. These family members include: Unmarried children under the age of 21 of principal U visa recipients; Spouses of principal U visa recipients; Parents of principal U visa recipients under age 21; and Unmarried siblings under 18 years old of principal U visa recipients under age 21.

To apply for a U visa, one must file the USCIS Form I-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-918), and submit it to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) with all relevant documentation, including Form I-918B, the U visa law enforcement certification. The Form I-918B is a requirement for the U visa and must be certified by a qualified law enforcement agency including a federal, state, local law enforcement agency, prosecutor, judge, or other authority that has the responsibility for the investigation or prosecution of a qualifying crime. Essentially, the law enforcement agency must certify that the petitioner was a victim of a qualifying crime, has specific knowledge and details of crime, has been, is being, or is likely to be helpful to law enforcement in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of the qualifying crime. Qualifying crimes includes qualify for the U visa including murder, robbery, abduction, rape, sexual assault, kidnaping, incest, perjury, prostitution, obstruction of justice, etc.

The U visa is an extremely important incentive for victims of crimes to come forward to testify against the perpetrators. Because of the complexity of U visa petitions, applicants should seek assistance from a legal representative or victim advocate. It is important to know that certification by a law enforcement agency does not guarantee approval of a U visa. The USCIS must determine if other requirements of the U visa are met including whether the applicant has suffered substantial physical or mental abuse as a result of the subject criminal activity. However for victims of serious crimes without legal status especially women and children, the U visa may be their only hope to fight back.

Source: The U.S. Consulate General in Chennai

The mother of the beneficiary son filed a visa petition on his behalf when he was under the age of 21.  However, while the case was waiting for a visa number, the son turned 21 and, subsequently, the mother became a naturalized citizen.

The regulation automatically converts a F2A (minor unmarried child of resident parent) and F2B (adult unmarried child of resident parent) petition to be an immediate relative and F1 petition respectively upon the naturalization of the petitioner. 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(i)(3)

Section 6 of The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), also known as section 204(k)(2) of the INA, allows an alien to affirmatively opt out of automatic conversion from the F2B category to the F1 category by filing a written statement with the Attorney General.  However, BIA held that there is no provision of law that allows an applicant to “opt out” of automatic conversion from F2A to F1 when the petitioner-parent becomes a citizen. Hence, the son in this case is not able to adjust his status by using the current cut-off date under the Mexico F2A preference category. 

This is a very important decision on a controversial issue.  BIA did not address the Equal Protection argument raised by the son as it lacks authority to rule on Constitutional issues. However, the issue is hardly settled and will likely be revisited by a federal court soon.

The new rule applies to approximately 580 principal immigrant investors who had their Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur (I-526) approved between Jan. 1, 1995, and Aug. 31, 1998.  Their dependents are also covered.